FxPro vs FXTM: which broker wins in 2026?

How FxPro and FXTM compare at a glance

FxPro and FXTM are both Cyprus-rooted multi-asset brokers with strong global brand presence in Africa, the Middle East, Latin America, and South-East Asia. FxPro launched in London in 2006 and built its early reputation on the no-dealing-desk execution model — its marketing line "FxPro doesn't take the other side" has been a fixture of forex advertising for more than fifteen years. FXTM (the trading name of ForexTime) launched in 2011, founded by Andrey Dashin (also behind Alpari), and has expanded aggressively into emerging markets with a heavy focus on educational content, partner programmes, and localised funding methods.

The headline differences sit on the three pillars. FxPro wins on platform choice — MT4, MT5, cTrader, and the FxPro Edge proprietary platform — and on instrument breadth (forex, indices, shares, commodities, metals, futures). FXTM has the more accessible entry point with a $10 minimum deposit and more permissive offshore leverage up to 1:1000 versus FxPro's 1:500. Regulation favours FxPro narrowly, mainly because of the SCB Bahamas entity and the broader product registration across the FCA, CySEC, FSCA, and SCB. The side-by-side table below summarises every key spec.

Side-by-side: spec comparison

The "winner" tag flags the broker with the more favourable value for that row only. A small-account beginner will weight the min-deposit row much more heavily than an institutional-style trader will.

Spreads compared

This category is genuinely close. FxPro's Standard account quotes a typical EUR/USD spread of around 1.2 pips with no commission; the FxPro Raw account quotes from 0.45 pips with a $3.5-per-side ($7 round-turn) commission. FXTM's Standard account quotes EUR/USD around 1.3 pips with no commission; the FXTM Advantage account quotes from 0.3 pips with a tiered commission that runs from $4 per round-turn at base tiers down to a lower rate at higher monthly volumes. On the raw-style accounts, FXTM Advantage is marginally tighter than FxPro Raw at headline rates, but commission tiers can flip the result for low-volume traders.

Spreads at both brokers widen materially during the daily 21:00 GMT rollover window and during major data releases like NFP, FOMC, and ECB rate decisions — that is true for every market-maker and ECN-style broker. Neither broker is the absolute cheapest in the market on raw spread (IC Markets and Pepperstone keep a slight edge), but both are competitive in the upper-middle tier. For most traders the cost difference per round-turn is inside a dollar or two — not nothing, but rarely the decisive factor against platform and regulator preferences.

Cost per round-turn trade — example

Take a 1.0 standard-lot EUR/USD trade ($100,000 notional). On FxPro Raw at 0.45 pips plus $7 commission, the total cost is roughly $11.50 per round-turn. On FXTM Advantage at 0.3 pips plus a base $5 commission, the total cost is roughly $8 per round-turn for low-tier traders, dropping toward $6-$7 for higher-volume tiers. On Standard accounts, FxPro at 1.2 pips works out around $12 per round-turn with no commission, FXTM at 1.3 pips around $13. Real spreads vary by market conditions — check live spreads on each broker's site before opening trades.

Regulation and safety compared

Both brokers operate group structures across multiple jurisdictions. FxPro Group entities hold authorisations with the UK FCA (FRN 509956), CySEC (Cyprus, EU passportable), FSCA (South Africa), and SCB (Bahamas, for offshore clients). FXTM Group entities hold authorisations with the UK FCA (FRN 777911), CySEC, FSCA, and FSC Mauritius. Both brokers are firmly in the multi-regulator tier — well above offshore-only competitors and pure introducing brokers — but FxPro has marginally broader coverage thanks to the SCB Bahamas entity and a longer FCA history.

Both brokers segregate client funds in tier-1 banks. EU clients of either broker are covered by the Investor Compensation Fund up to €20,000; UK clients of FxPro UK are covered by the FSCS up to £85,000. Neither broker has had material recent regulatory enforcement that should swing the decision, though both have received the typical mid-tier notices over the years on marketing language and client-onboarding disclosures. The regulator pillar goes narrowly to FxPro on breadth, but for the typical retail client the practical protection is comparable.

Trading platforms compared

FxPro wins this category convincingly. It offers the full platform suite: MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 (desktop, web, mobile), cTrader (desktop, web, mobile) for ECN-style trading with depth-of-market visibility, and the FxPro Edge proprietary platform that bundles charting, news, and order management in a web-first UI. cTrader is particularly important for scalpers who want level-II pricing and faster fills than MT4. FxPro's FxPro Edge platform has also matured significantly over the past two years and is now a credible third option alongside MetaTrader and cTrader.

FXTM offers MT4 and MT5 across desktop, web, and mobile, plus the FXTM Trader mobile app that wraps MetaTrader's standard order types in a cleaner mobile UI. No cTrader, no proprietary desktop platform. For traders who already live in MetaTrader and have no need for cTrader, that is sufficient. For traders who want platform flexibility — especially the ability to switch between MetaTrader and cTrader on the same broker — FxPro has the clear edge. Both brokers offer expert advisor support on MetaTrader and competitive execution speed in the 50–150ms range.

Who wins for which use case

For scalpers and high-frequency traders

FxPro wins. The cTrader platform, combined with the Raw account, gives scalpers level-II pricing, faster execution, and one-click order entry that MetaTrader can match only with third-party add-ons. FXTM Advantage is cost-competitive but lacks cTrader.

For beginners

FXTM wins. The $10 Micro-account minimum is a meaningfully lower bar than FxPro's $100, the FXTM education hub is well-organised with multilingual webinars, and the FXTM Trader app provides a beginner-friendly entry to MetaTrader's order-type complexity. FxPro is friendly enough but raises the entry bar both on deposit and on platform choice.

For swing and position traders

FxPro wins narrowly. The broader instrument range — particularly futures CFDs and a stronger share-CFD list — gives position traders more strategy flexibility than FXTM's more focused forex-plus-metals lineup. Both brokers offer comparable overnight swap rates.

For copy trading and social traders

FXTM wins. The FXTM Invest copy-trading product gives clients a first-party way to follow strategy managers with transparent equity curves and risk metrics. FxPro relies primarily on third-party copy-trading services and MetaTrader signals, which work but feel less integrated.

For high-leverage trading

FXTM wins. Through its offshore entity (FSC Mauritius), FXTM offers up to 1:1000 retail leverage, exceeding FxPro's 1:500 offshore cap. EU and UK clients of both brokers are capped at 1:30 under ESMA and FCA rules. Important caveat: high leverage magnifies losses just as fast as gains.

Pros and cons of each broker

Final verdict: FxPro vs FXTM

FxPro and FXTM are closer matchups than their differing reputations might suggest. Both are well-regulated, both have meaningful tenure in the market, both offer the same core MetaTrader platforms, and both quote competitive spreads in the upper-middle tier of the industry. FxPro takes the overall narrow win because of the broader platform line-up — having cTrader and FxPro Edge alongside MetaTrader gives serious traders real flexibility — and a slightly stronger regulatory footprint thanks to the long FCA history and the SCB Bahamas entity. FXTM keeps a clear edge for low-deposit beginners, high-leverage offshore traders, and clients who want a first-party copy-trading product.

Our decision rule: if you want platform choice, broader instrument coverage, and a slightly stronger regulator footprint, choose FxPro. If you want a $10 entry point, 1:1000 offshore leverage, or the integrated FXTM Invest copy-trading product, choose FXTM. Both brokers carry the same EU and UK retail leverage caps. For traders deciding between this pair and the top ECN-style brokers (IC Markets, Pepperstone), the answer usually depends on whether you want cTrader as an option — which FxPro provides but IC Markets and Pepperstone provide more cheaply. See our methodology page for the full scoring framework.

Frequently asked questions