Pepperstone and IC Markets are two of the most consistently recommended forex and CFD brokers for EU-based retail traders. Both hold CySEC regulation (as required for EU retail access post-Brexit), both offer tight raw spreads, and both support MT4, MT5, and cTrader. At a surface level they look almost identical. This comparison goes deeper to show where they actually differ — and which is the better fit for your trading style.
Pepperstone — founded in 2010 in Melbourne, Australia. EU entity regulated by CySEC (Cyprus). Also regulated by FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), and DFSA (UAE). Approximately 400,000 active clients globally. Known for: fast execution, wide TradingView integration, and strong customer support.
IC Markets — founded in 2007 in Sydney, Australia. EU entity: Raw Trading Ltd, regulated by CySEC. Also regulated by ASIC. Approximately 180,000+ active clients. Known for: some of the tightest spreads in the industry on Razor accounts, institutional-grade ECN execution.
| Feature | Pepperstone | IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2010 — Melbourne, Australia | 2007 — Sydney, Australia |
| EU regulation | CySEC — DRCOR (Cyprus) | CySEC — Raw Trading Ltd |
| Additional regulation | FCA, ASIC, DFSA, SCB, BaFin, CMA | ASIC, FSA Seychelles |
| Negative balance protection | Yes — EU entity | Yes — EU entity |
| ESIC investor compensation | Up to €20,000 (ICF Cyprus) | Up to €20,000 (ICF Cyprus) |
| Max leverage — EUR/USD (retail EU) | 1:30 (ESMA limit) | 1:30 (ESMA limit) |
| Minimum deposit | No minimum (Razor account) | €200 (Raw account) |
| Raw spread — EUR/USD (typical) | 0.0–0.1 pip + $3.50/lot commission | 0.0 pip + $3.50/lot commission |
| Standard spread — EUR/USD (typical) | ~1.0 pip, no commission | ~0.8 pip, no commission |
| Trading platforms | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView | MT4, MT5, cTrader |
| TradingView integration | Yes — live trading via TradingView | No native TradingView integration |
| Execution model | ECN / NDD (Razor account) | ECN / NDD (Raw account) |
| Average execution speed | ~30–50ms reported | ~35–40ms reported |
| Instruments available | 1,200+ (forex, indices, commodities, crypto, shares) | 2,250+ (broader shares selection) |
| VPS for algorithmic trading | Free VPS with qualifying deposit | Free VPS with qualifying volume |
On raw/ECN accounts, both brokers target 0.0 pip spreads on EUR/USD during peak liquid hours. IC Markets has a slight historical edge on consistent 0.0 pip delivery. Pepperstone's Razor account typically shows 0.0–0.1 pip in practice. Both charge $3.50 per lot per side (total $7.00 round turn) on raw accounts.
On standard accounts (no commission), IC Markets averages around 0.6–0.8 pip on EUR/USD and Pepperstone averages around 1.0–1.1 pip. For standard-account traders, IC Markets is the tighter option. For raw-account traders, both are essentially the same cost.
Trading 1 standard lot of EUR/USD on a raw account at $3.50/side: total commission cost per round trip = $7.00. If the spread is 0.0 pip, your total all-in cost is $7.00. If the spread widens to 0.2 pip during off-peak hours (common on both brokers), the all-in cost becomes approximately $7.00 + $2.00 (EUR/USD 0.2 pip on 1 standard lot) = $9.00. This is the actual cost to model when backtesting strategies.
Both brokers support MT4, MT5, and cTrader. Pepperstone has a meaningful advantage for traders who use TradingView: Pepperstone is one of the few brokers offering live order execution directly from TradingView charts. This means you can run your analysis in TradingView and place trades without switching to a separate MT4/MT5 window. IC Markets does not offer this — you would need to maintain TradingView for analysis and a separate platform for execution.
For algorithmic traders using MQL4/MQL5 EAs or cTrader cBots, the difference between the two is minimal — both offer stable API connections and free VPS hosting to qualifying accounts.
Both brokers' EU entities hold CySEC licences, meaning EU retail traders are subject to the same protections: leverage capped at 1:30 on major pairs, negative balance protection mandatory, Investor Compensation Fund of Cyprus coverage up to €20,000, and client funds segregated from company funds.
The practical difference is that Pepperstone holds more regulatory licences across more jurisdictions (FCA in the UK, BaFin in Germany, DFSA in Dubai, CMA in Kenya). This breadth suggests a more established multi-regulatory compliance operation, though for an EU retail trader using the CySEC entity, this additional coverage has no direct effect on your account protections.
For a first account, Pepperstone is the marginally better starting point. No minimum deposit (vs IC Markets' €200 minimum), TradingView compatibility, and a reputation for responsive customer support make the onboarding experience more accessible. Both brokers are trustworthy, CySEC-regulated, and suitable for retail EU traders. The cost difference on raw accounts is negligible. Once you know your preferred platform and trading style, either is an excellent long-term choice.
See the full CompareFX broker table: spreads, platforms, minimum deposits, and regulatory details for every major broker we track.
View all brokers →